你竟然公开偷走我的山想阻挡我无限开阔的视野？先罚你给我翻译一段文字﹕ The method of approximating the Newtonian planetary precession by modeling the planets as mass rings has been used in the literature, although no rigorous justification for it has been presented (to my knowledge). One example is a 1979 paper by Price and Rush, in which they not only use the mass ring model, they also make use of a slightly simplifying approximation by neglecting the angular offset of Mercury from the center of the solar system. (See their note 11.) The net effect of the bias due to this simplification, combined with the bias resulting from the use of the mass ring model, is to yield an incredibly good agreement with the more sophisticated methods. They calculate a total Newtonian precession of 531.9 arcseconds per century, essentially in perfect agreement with the best modern theoretical value of 532 - but this close agreement is spurious, since it results from two errors that just coincidentally happen to cancel each other. When the mass ring model is evaluated exactly, with no simplifying approximations (as we've done above), it yields nearly 550 arcseconds per century. The observed precession is 575, so even our crude approximation suggests that Mercury exhibits a bit more precession that we would expect based on Newtonian theory, but it only indicates about 25 arcseconds per century extra precession, whereas the best theoretical value raises this to 43. For a derivation of this extra precession from general relativity, see the note on Anomalous Precession>. For a historical account of Einstein's solution method, see the note on An Anomaly in Translation>.
我在反思，这篇网文来自于一个数学网站 Math Pages> ，其专业数学水平无疑地要比我高多了，可是发现这样的严重问题为什么他们不写论文来更正？还有一个严重问题，就是我无法解释为什么金星每百年的近日点进动是 -108.80"？在决定写论文之前我必须把所有这些问题都得弄清楚。