财经社区女性社区汽车社区军事社区文学社区社会社区娱乐社区游戏社区个人空间
上一主题:相对论的难题之一:“夹角不定” 下一主题:如果明知道有破绽,还强加辩护,...
Forum messages (subject: zero-particle is most elementary particle )
[楼主] 作者:zerotom  发表时间:2002/01/08 23:20
点击:256次

Unorthodox ideas - zero-particle is most elementary particle Subscribe From: PESS5 Jan-4 1:19 am To: CHOPING (3 of 20) 517.3 in reply to 517.1 Hmmm. Well, there is no doubt some most elementary particle exists. I would agree that it would be of the EM energy as opposed to matter energy. The most elementary particle would be an EM wave of no rest mass and possessing the most minimal of effective mass of all EM waves. But then, this is merely a wave in spacetime just as it begins to form or cease. This implies that by elementary, one means "possessing the smallest amount of energy". One could argue that the 1st primordal particle (assuming it existed) which created the big bang & later the universe as we know it was the most elementary particle from which all others were born ... although it would bear the highest energy, all the energy in the universe today including it's potential energy it may have. Pess5 From: WHELOC Jan-4 9:59 am To: PESS5 (4 of 20) 517.4 in reply to 517.3 I, at least, have some doubt that "some most elementaty particle exists". Why couldn't particles be forever divisible? We have the math to describe such a universe? --- Adam Wheelock Boisvert "Terra non est centra mundi." - Nicholas of Cusa Edited 1/4/2002 10:07:51 AM ET by WHELOC From: TODDKELSO Jan-4 12:23 pm To: WHELOC (5 of 20) 517.5 in reply to 517.4 >I, at least, have some doubt that some most elementary particle exists. Why couldn't particles be forever divisible? < Space has smallest parts, known as points. Further, space is, and is nothing other than, the set of all its points. A physical object always occupies some part of space, some set of points. If P is any one of these points, then some part of the object must occupy the point P. Otherwise, P would not be one of the points that is occupied by the whole object. If Q is some other one of these points, then the part of the object that occupies the point Q is a different part of the object than the part of the object that occupies the point P, since no object, and no one part of any object, has two different locations in space at the same time. The object is thus one of two things. Either it is itself an object that occupies precisely one point, that is, it is a particle, or else it is a set of more than one particle. 。。。。。。。。。。。。。。 http://zerotom.com
本帖地址:http://club.xilu.com/hongbin/msgview-950451-11936.html[复制地址]
上一主题:相对论的难题之一:“夹角不定” 下一主题:如果明知道有破绽,还强加辩护,...

精彩推荐>>

  简捷回复 [点此进入编辑器回帖页]  文明上网 理性发言
 推荐到西陆名言:
签  名:
作  者:
密  码:
游客来访 
注册用户 提 交
西陆网(www.xilu.com )版权所有 点击拥有西陆免费论坛  联系西陆小精灵

0.12309789657593