|
在 http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/44738> 有一段文字记载如下﹕ 1919 SOLAR ECLIPSE: The more sensationalized generally accepted ‘proof' of General Relativity was the results of the experiment done on May 29, 1919 during a solar eclipse. In Nov 1919, the announcement came from London, that after studying the photos taken during the eclipse, that the results had verified Einstein's theory of General Relativity. This announcement was not entirely truthful. During the eclipse, three separate experiments had been conducted. These expeditions sent to the island of Principle, West Africa and Brazil were organized by England's Astronomer Royal and Sir Arthur Eddington (English astronomer and founder of modern astrophysics). These photographic studies were all only approximations due to the nature of the observations and the quality of the equipment used. In one of these experiments, the outcome agreed with Einstein's calculations. In the second experiment, the outcome agreed with Newton's calculations. In the third experiment, the outcome was somewhere in between. The overall outcome of these solar experiments did not prove Einstein's theory. The national report issued from London stating that it did, was obviously based on selective data. The fact that Eddington was a strong believer in Einstein's theories may have prejudiced the London report. The outcome which had verified Newton's calculations was not mentioned even though it was equally as valid.
这段文字的大意是： 1919年日食：越是耸人听闻而被普遍接受“证据”的广义相对论实验结果，是在1919年5月29日的一次日食期间做的。在1919年11月，宣布，从伦敦传来喜讯，经研究后的照片在这次日食中表示，检测结果已证实爱因斯坦的相对论，广义相对论。这项宣布并不完全属实。这些探险队送到岛上的原则，西非和巴西举办了由英国的天文学家皇家爵士阿瑟爱丁顿（英国天文学家和创办现代天体物理学）。这些摄影研究都只是近似由于性质的意见和质量，所使用的设备。在其中一个实验中，结果符合爱因斯坦的计算值。在第二次试验，结果符合牛顿(理论)的计算值。在第三次试验，其结果是介于两者之间。总体结果这些太阳能实验并未证明爱因斯坦的相对论。全国发表的报告，由伦敦表示，它的确是很明显的基础上有选择性的数据。事实爱丁顿是一个强有力的拥护者，在爱因斯坦的理论可能有偏见，在伦敦的报告。结果，这已经证明了牛顿这样的计算方法没有提及，即使这是同样有效。
(注：牛顿理论值只有广义相对论值的一半，我的引力场以太理论则根据以太质量密度将对牛顿理论有所修正) ※※※※※※ 相对论一派胡言 物理界混淆是非 时空物绝对独立 “倒相者”返璞归真 |