| 读帖时，帖子不存在 |
| 读帖时，帖子不存在 |
|
前几天去信探问，主编惊奇给我回复：I WONDER IF YOU MAY NOT HAVE GOTTEN THIS MESSAGE FROM AUGUST! 贴一下我想也不涉及机密吧？ Dear Dr. Zhang: Here is my next draft typeset version of your paper. I have made an attempt to go through more carefully to make your meanings more clear for English-speaking readers. I have marked in red the passages that were difficult, and followed them with recommended changes in green. If I did not understand a passage at all, then I just marked it in red, and my recommendation is to delete it. If you disagree with any of my recommendations, or want to make other changes, please use color in this doc file to call my attention to what you want. Make text to be removed red, and make text to be added green. It is very important that you use color. I am not likely to find any changes that you want if you do not use color. Sincerely, Dr. Cynthia Kolb Whitney Editor, Galilean Electrodynamics Visiting Industry Professor, Tufts University, retired |
|
回复:谁同意收录你的亚光子长列之类的奇谈怪论，谁就是垃圾杂志！ 论文又作了一次修改（这次主要是英文习惯用语性，主编用红绿颜色修改建议），一个月前就发给我的信箱，我却当垃圾删了！ |
|
如果反相对论、量子力学的道路是正确的，那么，到目前为止〈大学物理〉、〈物理学报〉〈中国科学〉收入的都是垃圾！ 论文又作了一次修改（这次主要是英文习惯用语性，主编用红绿颜色修改建议），一个月前就发给我的信箱，我却当垃圾删了！ |
|
红心好长时不来了!在我的眼里,量子力学和相对论都是光本性问题没有澄清的怪胎!量子力学根本没有资格返回来评论光本!因为它是子辈 论文又作了一次修改（这次主要是英文习惯用语性，主编用红绿颜色修改建议），一个月前就发给我的信箱，我却当垃圾删了！ |
|
我看了拉普拉斯关于土星卫星的轨道共振分布研究，结合行星轨道特征类推到球状星团(由上百万恒星密集组成)，也肯定服从某种量子态 ※※※※※※ 相对论一派胡言 物理界混淆是非 时空物绝对独立 “倒相者”返璞归真 |