财经社区女性社区汽车社区军事社区文学社区社会社区娱乐社区游戏社区个人空间
上一主题:引力温差问题的提出 下一主题:业余研究的误区
Experimental Confirmation for the Rotational Effect of LightSource
[楼主] 作者:刘武青  发表时间:2004/03/01 14:32
点击:296次

Experimental Confirmation

for the Rotational Effect of Light Source

LIU, Wu-qing

ChongQing TongJunGe Joint-stock Company

West Libration Road, 1, Building 5

YuZhong District

ChongQing 400012

 

Telephone: 023-89885201

URL: http://cqfyl.nease.net>

E-mail: cqfyl@163.net

 

Abstract

       The light can cause the photocell to generate the electric current. After the light source rotates, or the light goes through a rotating transparent medium, or the light is reflected by a rotating reflective medium, the data of current and light-pressure, etc. produced by the photocell due to the light is different from the data for the stationary light source. This phenomenon is called the rotational effect of light source. The Compton effect (or called Compton-Wu effect) is presented as the energy decrease, the wavelength increase and the frequency decrease of a portion of light; the optical rotational effect of lights is presented in an opposite way, i.e. the energy increase, the wavelength decrease and the frequency increase of a portion of light. I have described, in another article, the experiment of the rotating object where the light source is. This article is to describe the experiment about the phenomena generated when the light going through the rotational transparent medium.

 

Key words: Energy, Light source rotation, Compton effect, Rotational convex lens

 

 

Introduction

 

                           In 1922, American physicist Compton discovered the Compton effect. Chinese physicist WU You-xun carried out many experiments and confirmed the Compton effect together with Mr. Compton, therefore it is referred as “Compton-Wu effect” in some literatures.

 

       The light can cause the photocell to generate the electric current. After the light source rotates (the body where the light source is at rotates), or after the light goes through a rotating transparent medium, or after the light is reflected by the rotating reflective medium, the phenomena of that the current and light-pressure, etc. (produced by the photocell due to the light) has been influenced is called the light source rotational effect.

 

       This article lets the light to pass through the rotational transparent medium and to pass through the stationary transparent medium, then shine to the photocell. Comparing the electric current produced by above both ways, the current values shall be different. Thus, by using the means of letting the light to pass through the transparent medium, it demonstrates the emergence of a new optical phenomenon, then confirms the light source rotational effect.

 

       The Compton (or Compton-Wu) effect is presented as the energy decrease, the wavelength increase and the frequency decrease of a portion of light; the optical rotational effect of lights is presented in an opposite way, i.e. the energy increase, the wavelength decrease and the frequency increase of a portion of light.

 

 

(1) Experimental principle

 

       An object, comparing when it is rotating and when it is stationary, has more kinetic energy (or momentum) in the former case; at the same time has centrifugal force when it is rotating.

 

       I have written that, in the patent manual published in 2002 by Chinese Patent Bureau, “the light passes through the transparent object, if rotating the transparent object. When the intensity, frequency and the distance from the photocell are unchanged, the electric current generated by the photocell has a certain value. But when the light beam passes through the transparent (or reflective) object, it is effected when the transparent object is moving or rotating, specially is seen on the current intensity of light pressure and photoelectric effect. The light passes through the moving light path, convex or concave lenses, or convex and concave coexistent lenses. The effects of 3 ways (i.e. the light source itself rotating, the passing through a transparent object and the passing through a reflective object) are identical.”[1]

 

       After the light passes through the region where the energy (or momentum) is large, the energy of light increases; this is the principle of this experiment.

 

 

(2) Experimental equipments and materials

 

2.1 Light source

       Using the scattered light, installing the cream color energy-saving light above the bench drill.

2.2 Electrical drill

       The specification: 13mm in diameter, rotational speed of 2600 revolutions per minute.

2.3 Convex lens

       Using the semifinished product of presbyopic glasses, the product name: galbanum (white resin), the specification: 65mm in diameter, the spherical glass: +8.00, the thickness: 1.2, drilling a round hole of 6 mm in diameter at the center of convex lens.

2.4 Screw and nuts

       The specification: screw with the diameter of 6 mm and the length of 150 mm, 1 piece; nuts with the diameter of 6 mm, 2 pieces.

2.5 Luxmeter

       Model: FX-101 with the minimal measurement range of 1 Lux

 

(3) Experimental method

 

       The detailed method is: to drill a hole at the middle of convex lens, to put the screw through the hole, then to hold the convex lens firmly by two nuts; then, to mount the screw on the head of electric drill.

       There exists the scattered (i.e. the soft) light above the electric drill. The focus equipment is installed above the lamp, or the device (e.g. the scattering screen, the softening paper or the reflective umbrella, etc.) to scatter the light is attached on the lamp, then the light emitted has the diffusive feature, the resulting light is rather soft. After the scattered light passes through the convex lens, due to its focusing effect, the focused light beam is formed and illuminates on the luxmeter.

       Under the condition that the distance between the convex lens and the light-receiving place is unchanged, the readings on luxmeter are different between when convex lens is rotating and when it is stationary.

       The scattered light goes through the stationary convex lens to form a focused light beam that arrives at the luxmeter to generate a reading. The distance between the convex lens and the luxmeter is adjusted so that the reading on the luxmeter is 9, which also can be any other values.

       The scattered light goes through the rotating convex lens to form a focused light beam that arrives at the luxmeter to generate a second reading. Compare the difference between these two readings.

       The followings are the schematic diagrams. Figure 1 is for the stationary convex lens; Figure 2 is for the rotating one.

       Notice that after the light passing through the rotating transparent medium and arriving at the luxmeter and photocell, the reading on luxmeter and the current intensity on ampere-meter is different from the light passing through the same distance to arrive at the luxmeter and photocell when the rotating transparent medium is stationary.

 

Figure 1

 


      Mounting head of electric drill

 

 


Screw

 


Stationary convex lens 

 


                                                          

Focused light beam

 

 

 

Data

Luxmeter, light receiving place                                    Luxmeter data

                                                            reading

 

 


Figure 2

 


      Mounting head of electric drill

 

 


Screw

 

 


Rotating convex lens 

 

                                                          

Focused light beam

 

 

 


Data

Luxmeter, light receiving place                                     Luxmeter data

                                                              reading

 

 


(4) Experimental data

 

       Data: (the unit is lux, if adding a black paper [with a round hole of 6 mm diameter in the middle] at the light receiving place of luxmeter to block the light, when the focused light beam is illuminated at the round hole, the data unit on the luxmeter is no longer the lux, but there is still the data measurement.

       The reading on the luxmeter illuminated by the scattered light from the indoor lamp: 4. The distance between the convex lens and the luxmeter is unchanged.

       The reading when the focused light beam illuminating on the luxmeter after the scattered light passing through the stationary convex lens: 9.

       The reading when the focused light beam illuminating on the luxmeter after the scattered light passing through the rotating convex lens: 10.

Table 1. The change on the luxmeter readings for a same light passing through the stationary convex lens and through the rotating convex lens

 

 

Light pattern

Indoor scattered light

Focused light beam after the stationary convex lens

Focused light beam after the rotating convex lens

Luxmeter reading

4

9

10

 

 

 (5) New physical phenomena

 

       This experiment shows that, after the convex lens rotates, there are effects on the reading of luxmeter, i.e. the current generated via the photoelectric effect increases.

       Three different data appear in this experiment:

(a)    Data for the indoor scattered light: data is 4, normal;

(b)   Data when the convex lens is stationary (plus the effect of indoor scattered light on the photocell): data is 9, normal;

(c)    Data when the convex lens is rotating (including the effects of indoor scattered light and of rotation of convex lens): data is 10. The difference between (b) and (c) is 1, which is abnormal. This shows that there is a new physical phenomenon.

 

 

(6) Experimental analysis

 

       From the increase of the reading on luxmeter, it can be understood as the energy of light increases, the wavelength of light decreases, the frequency of light increases.

From the theoretical analysis and the experimental measurement, comparing the rotating and stationary objects, the energy (and momentum) of the former is larger than the latter, and is not in the same order of magnitude comparing with the energy of light quantum, also the difference is extremely large, i.e. the energy of the rotating object is far greater than of the light quantum. Therefore, 3 different data appear during the experimental process.

       The data for the indoor scattered light is normal, data is 4, can be explained by the existing theory.

       When the convex lens is stationary, the data generated on the photocell is 9, also can be explained by the existing theory.

       The abnormal data appears when the convex lens rotating, data is 10 which is related with the rotation of convex lens.

       The difference of current generated by the photocell is 1 due to the light source is rotating and is stationary. From the view of experimental equipment and method used, this data of 1 is reliable which is not caused by the experimental error, but is caused by the different conditions (i.e. the convex lens is rotating or stationary).

       For this difference of 1, no existing theory can explain, i.e. it is a new physical phenomenon. This data increase of 1 may be similarly explained with the existing Compton (or Compton-Wu) effect that is presented as the energy decrease, the wavelength increase and the frequency decrease of a portion of light; the optical rotational effect of lights is presented as the energy increase, the wavelength decrease and the frequency increase of a portion of light.

       The Compton effect did not experiment on the rotation of X-ray source or of receiving place. Therefore, for the Compton effect it should further experiment on the rotation of light source or of receiving place or of both, in order to prove the Compton effect from the view angle of light source rotation.

       The experiment described in this paper shows that the energy can affect the light; the interaction force (centrifugal force) can affect the light; the light can transmit the energy and the interaction force (centrifugal force); there is the close relation between light and energy as well as between light and force.

       The energy of electric charged particles can be increased with electron electrostatic accelerator and cyclotron accelerator. The rotation of light source is a way to increase the energy of non-electric-charged particles (e.g. photons), the method of multiple level of light source rotation may be used too.

 

 

(7) Experimental conclusion

      

       This experiment has shown that the light with the frequency of V and the intensity of P passing through the rotating transparent medium causes the change on the current generated by photocell (plus the amperemeter), also on the reading of luxmeter. The energy of light increases, its wavelength decreases and its frequency increases.

       The experiments about the rotation of the object where the light source is at have been done, e.g. the rotation of the pen-shape laser and of the violet LED (light emission diode), etc. The experimental result is that the amperemeter (photocell) and the readings of luxmeter have had the change. These have been mentioned in my articles (e.g. “The experimental proof of that there is limitation on the energy formula and the photoelectric equation of Einstein light quantum”, etc.)[2]

       The further experimental direction: to increase the rotational speed of the rotating transparent medium; to use more accurate apparatus, e.g. the now available “measurement device for photoelectric effect”, etc.; to use the phototube to measure the change on Plank constant. Also, the rotation of the rotating transparent medium has 3 states: acceleration, deceleration and uniform speed, to find the variation patterns on the photoelectric current intensity, the light pressure, the light quantum, the energy intensity of energy quantum as well as the frequency and the wave length for these 3 states. To determine whether it is a variation of the frequency V, or of the intensity P, or of V and P together? (the variation on the measured line position when a light enters the spectrum meter). The variation of temperature (with the digital thermometer) can be measured by putting the thermometer at the focused (round) position before and after the rotation.

       The relationship should be found between photon and electron during the process of a light passing through the rotating transparent medium, between the monochromatic light (i.e. with a single frequency) and the photoelectric current reading (of photocell), light pressure. To find the variation pattern on the luxmeter reading and light pressure when the rotating transparent medium is a conductor.

 

 

References

 

[1] Wu-qing LIU, The patent application manual published by Chinese Patent Bureau with the title of “Rotational effect of light source”. Patent number: 1348094, publishing date: 2002.05.08

[2] Wu-qing LIU, “The experimental proof of that there is limitation on the energy formula and the photoelectric equation of Einstein light quantum” at the web site “Contemporary Physics World – Collection of Physics Theses” with the URL of http://www.physicswd.com>, publishing date: 2003.09.15

Also, once published at ISSN 1531-085x Copyright 2003 USA Matter Regularity No 3.

 

 

Brief introduction of the author

 

       LIU Wu-qing, male, born in August of 1947. His research directions are the new effects in the fields of physics, chemistry, optics, and acoustics, etc.; the effect on the universal gravitational force by the screened electric force, magnetic force and electromagnetic force; the electrochemical reaction in magnetic field and electronic field; the phenomenon generated by the rotation of light source and of acoustic source, etc. He has been won the teach-oneself-to-be-success award at the ChongQing city, the SiChuan province and the national levels.

       The key words searched on WWW: three effects, Newtonian universal gravitational force, photoelectric equation, field electric source, effect of light source rotation.

Name of personal web site: three effects.

URL:  http://cqfyl.nease.net>

E-address: cqfyl@163.net

 

 



※※※※※※
刘武青
本帖地址:http://club.xilu.com/hongbin/msgview-950451-43875.html[复制地址]
上一主题:引力温差问题的提出 下一主题:业余研究的误区
 [2楼]  作者:jqsphy  发表时间: 2004/03/01 17:00 

早已过时了,美国的Mashhoon(光子自旋-转动耦合)早已研究了,我的研究也在你之前。况且你还有乱说的东西。
Experimental Confirmation for the Rotational Effect of LightSource
[楼主]  [3楼]  作者:刘武青  发表时间: 2004/03/01 21:55 

拿出证据来,最好是实物

记得你在帖子中谈光源旋转效应是无聊研究.

网友们是看到你的帖子的,你作为版主,删除了也无用.

我早已编入了三个效应电子期刊中.

刘武青,三个效应, http://cqfyl.nease.net

 



※※※※※※
刘武青
 [4楼]  作者:jqsphy  发表时间: 2004/03/02 10:52 

我的论文与Mashhoon的论文的出处我已经给出多次。实验在1993年完成(见Mashhoon的参考文献)。

【【【【【我的论文与Mashhoon的论文的出处我已经给出多次。实验在1993年完成(见Mashhoon的参考文献)。】】】】

记得你在帖子中谈光源旋转效应是无聊研究.

【【【【说无聊研究,是指您的那种夸夸其谈风格的研究。您根本就不懂转动实验的本质,只有其量子效应(自旋-转动耦合效应才值得研究),其他的夸夸其谈的都属于无聊研究。】】】

网友们是看到你的帖子的,你作为版主,删除了也无用.


 

我早已编入了三个效应电子期刊中.


 

刘武青,三个效应, http://cqfyl.nease.net


 

 


 

[楼主]  [5楼]  作者:刘武青  发表时间: 2004/03/02 22:06 

现在数码相机是很方便的,来张实验照片嘛。在实验中,你用了光电池测试吗?说谎言是不对的。

 现在数码相机是很方便的,来张实验照片嘛。在实验中,你用了光电池测试吗?说谎言是不对的。
或者,你用了照度计测试吗?
第一步,应该看看光源旋转是否影响光电效应产生的电流强度。
也许你说你没有数码相机,也借不到数码相机。
扫描仪可以借到吧。
将论文中有关使用光电池等的内容上在网中,让网友们看看。
我还是这几句话:
  拿出证据来,最好是实物。

刘武青,三个效应,http://cqfyl.nease.net>

========================================
  我的论文与Mashhoon的论文的出处我已经给出多次。实验在1993年完成(见Mashhoon的参考文献)。
作者:jqsphy(xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) 2004/03/02 10:52   字节:575 点击:5次 帖号:43891
当前论坛: [挑战相对论]讨论区 [hongbin.xilubbs.com] 
 
【【【【【我的论文与Mashhoon的论文的出处我已经给出多次。实验在1993年完成(见Mashhoon的参考文献)。】】】】

记得你在帖子中谈光源旋转效应是无聊研究.

【【【【说无聊研究,是指您的那种夸夸其谈风格的研究。您根本就不懂转动实验的本质,只有其量子效应(自旋-转动耦合效应才值得研究),其他的夸夸其谈的都属于无聊研究。】】】

网友们是看到你的帖子的,你作为版主,删除了也无用.

我早已编入了三个效应电子期刊中.

刘武青,三个效应, http://cqfyl.nease.net>
-------------------------------------------
 Experimental Confirmation for the Rotational Effect of LightSource  [刘武青] 68K 03.01 14:32 17
  早已过时了,美国的Mashhoon(光子自旋-转动耦合)早已研究了,我的研究也在你之前。况且你还有乱说的东西。  [jqsphy] 0  03.01 17:00 4
  拿出证据来,最好是实物  [刘武青] 205  03.01 21:55 7
  我的论文与Mashhoon的论文的出处我已经给出多次。实验在1993年完成(见Mashhoon的参考文献)。  [jqsphy] 575  03.02 10:52 5
 
===========================================

 



※※※※※※
刘武青
 [6楼]  作者:jqsphy  发表时间: 2004/03/03 15:35 

还数码相机?呵呵,您的土法研究就这样的实验工具。实验请见

还数码相机?呵呵,您的土法研究就这样的实验工具。

实验请见:文献Mashhoon, B., Class. Quant. Grav. {\bf 17}, 2399 (2000).以及其后所附的参考文献(发表日期为1993年,有两篇实验文献),

理论请见本人的论文:Physica Scripta 65卷, 645 (2002)。

以上我给出了理论与实验证据了。您的研究在以上文献看来,属于无聊研究,瞎研究。实验在1993年做出来了,装置比您的复杂多了,要有很多人完成,全世界没有几家能做。您的土法研究只能用来吹牛。吹牛本无所谓,但是信口开河瞎吹牛开国际玩笑就不对了。

 

[楼主]  [7楼]  作者:刘武青  发表时间: 2004/03/03 22:15 

一句话,你们在实验过程中使用了光电池吗?有胆量回答吗?

   一句话,你们在实验过程中使用了光电池吗?有胆量回答吗?

不要回避问题嘛。
我在实验过程中使用了光电池,这就是我的实验与你们的实验本质上的区别。
我的实验有可复性。

刘武青,三个效应,http://cqfyl.nease.net>
 
========================================== 
  还数码相机?呵呵,您的土法研究就这样的实验工具。实验请见
作者:jqsphy(xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) 2004/03/03 15:35   字节:516 点击:4次 帖号:43909
当前论坛: [挑战相对论]讨论区 [hongbin.xilubbs.com]   互换联接:30元赌一个百万富翁你敢吗 
 
还数码相机?呵呵,您的土法研究就这样的实验工具。

实验请见:文献Mashhoon, B., Class. Quant. Grav. {\bf 17}, 2399 (2000).以及其后所附的参考文献(发表日期为1993年,有两篇实验文献),

理论请见本人的论文:Physica Scripta 65卷, 645 (2002)。

以上我给出了理论与实验证据了。您的研究在以上文献看来,属于无聊研究,瞎研究。实验在1993年做出来了,装置比您的复杂多了,要有很多人完成,全世界没有几家能做。您的土法研究只能用来吹牛。吹牛本无所谓,但是信口开河瞎吹牛开国际玩笑就不对了。
 
 ----------------------------------------
 Experimental Confirmation for the Rotational Effect of LightSource  [刘武青] 68K 03.01 14:32 19
  早已过时了,美国的Mashhoon(光子自旋-转动耦合)早已研究了,我的研究也在你之前。况且你还有乱说的东西。  [jqsphy] 0  03.01 17:00 4
  拿出证据来,最好是实物  [刘武青] 205  03.01 21:55 7
  我的论文与Mashhoon的论文的出处我已经给出多次。实验在1993年完成(见Mashhoon的参考文献)。  [jqsphy] 575  03.02 10:52 10
  现在数码相机是很方便的,来张实验照片嘛。在实验中,你用了光电池测试吗?说谎言是不对的。  [刘武青] 1K 03.02 22:06 11
  还数码相机?呵呵,您的土法研究就这样的实验工具。实验请见  [jqsphy] 516  03.03 15:35 4
 =========================================

 



※※※※※※
刘武青
 [8楼]  作者:jqsphy  发表时间: 2004/03/04 13:06 

我总共四点意见:

我总共三点意见:

1。你的实验测量的是经典效应,1993年实验测量的是量子效应(光子自旋-转动耦合效应)。因此您的实验的意义大大下降了。既然是经典效应,那么就不具有时代特色,干嘛要到你刘武青时代才被发现?肯定是因为没有什么理论价值,所以没有人愿意去发表。

2。光源转动或者物体转动的确能产生一些效应,比如碳60分子会高速转动,每秒转一亿转,那么这种转动也会导致碳60分子光电子能谱发生细微移动。所以,说光源转动影响光电流,这也是有可能的。问题是:变化多大?实验能观察到吗?你的光源转动速度是多少?按照我的计算,这些效应是很微弱的,实验上根本测不到。你刘武青说你的实验测到了,那么你在杭州光学会议上来演示以下给我看看。

3。你说你的转动效应导致光电流发生变化,于是就说爱因斯坦光电效应公式需要打补丁。其实,您刘氏补丁法是与物理学研究基本方法背道而驰的。物理学研究基本方法是:尽量简化被研究对象,排除非本质的第二性因素,突出本质因素,揭示本质规律。你刘氏交叉法与补丁法却要把非本质因素也引入进去,干扰本质因素,这样反而揭示不了基本规律了,这不是物理学研究思想。按照刘氏交叉法,我还可以说在金属上添加磁场,电场,加热,加压,那么光电流也会发生变化,于是爱因斯坦光电效应公式也需要打补丁。你刘武青是否同意这些效应列为我沈氏效应呢??你是不是也要妒忌我呢??

以上三条,第一条体现你好大喜功;

第二条体现你吹牛(希望看到你的实验。我只有理论计算,我可以给你看我的计算);

第三条体现你挂羊头卖狗肉,瞎吹牛,违反物理学基本研究思想。

 [9楼]  作者:清华小猪  发表时间: 2004/03/04 13:34 

刘武青此人朽木不可雕

2。光源转动或者物体转动的确能产生一些效应,比如碳60分子会高速转动,每秒转一亿转,那么这种转动也会导致碳60分子光电子能谱发生细微移动。所以,说光源转动影响光电流,这也是有可能的。问题是:变化多大?实验能观察到吗?你的光源转动速度是多少?按照我的计算,这些效应是很微弱的,实验上根本测不到。你刘武青说你的实验测到了,那么你在杭州光学会议上来演示以下给我看看。

[[刘武青的装置能测到的东西是光电池的非线性效应,是光笔旋转导致的光斑扩大造成的。只要在光电池上罩一针孔板,就没有刘氏的这个效应了。早给他指出了,可惜这人朽木不可雕。]]

3。你说你的转动效应导致光电流发生变化,于是就说爱因斯坦光电效应公式需要打补丁。其实,您刘氏补丁法是与物理学研究基本方法背道而驰的。物理学研究基本方法是:尽量简化被研究对象,排除非本质的第二性因素,突出本质因素,揭示本质规律。你刘氏交叉法与补丁法却要把非本质因素也引入进去,干扰本质因素,这样反而揭示不了基本规律了,这不是物理学研究思想。按照刘氏交叉法,我还可以说在金属上添加磁场,电场,加热,加压,那么光电流也会发生变化,于是爱因斯坦光电效应公式也需要打补丁。你刘武青是否同意这些效应列为我沈氏效应呢??你是不是也要妒忌我呢??

[[如果光源旋转导致光子能量变化,那么仅仅是光电效应方程中的频率参数变化,方程本身不变。早给他指出要把研究对象和检测工具分离开,可惜这人粪土不可琢。 竟然能质问“您用了光电池了吗?”仿佛这是世界上最好的检测工具了。]]
 [10楼]  作者:jqsphy  发表时间: 2004/03/04 15:15 

小猪以上话说得对。爱因斯坦方程仍旧不变,变化的是频率参数,是外部条件在变,但爱氏方程仍旧是对的。唉,刘武青真是不顾三七廿
[[如果光源旋转导致光子能量变化,那么仅仅是光电效应方程中的频率参数变化,方程本身不变。早给他指出要把研究对象和检测工具分离开,可惜这人粪土不可琢。

【【【【对。小猪以上话说得对。爱因斯坦方程仍旧不变,变化的是频率参数,是外部条件在变,但爱氏方程仍旧是对的。唉,刘武青真是不顾三七廿一就胡言乱语。】】】
[楼主]  [11楼]  作者:刘武青  发表时间: 2004/03/04 21:53 

沈建其等人思想僵化


※※※※※※
刘武青
 [12楼]  作者:jqsphy  发表时间: 2004/03/05 22:10 

爱因斯坦光电效应方程是

爱因斯坦光电效应方程是
hf=W+1/2mv^2
其中f为光子频率,v为被打出来的电子的速度,W为金属逸出功。
光电流与电子速度大小有关。

就算刘武青实验可靠,那么光源转动影响了光子频率f,于是也影响了被打出电子的速度v,所以光电流发生改变。
看看,刘武青同学,这里只是输入f与输出v发生了改变,但是爱因斯坦方程hf=W+1/2mv^2并不改变啊!!何来打补丁一说??


注意:只是方程的因变量与自变量发生了改变啊!总之,方程hf=W+1/2mv^2并不变啊!
所以刘武青是在吹牛啊!!而且是瞎吹牛!

另,爱因斯坦的hf=W+1/2mv^2是其光子学说的表象而已,其1905年的理论核心是光子说,并非这个公式hf=W+1/2mv^2,这个公式即使变了,也不会影响其光子说这一核心。唉,刘武青不管三七廿一,就喜欢好大喜功。
即使加磁场,电场,加压,加热,也不改变爱氏方程的形式。

总之,刘武青瞎吹牛—+好大喜功+胡言乱语。

 

 

精彩推荐>>

  简捷回复 [点此进入编辑器回帖页]  文明上网 理性发言
 推荐到西陆名言:
签  名:
作  者:
密  码:
游客来访 
注册用户 提 交
西陆网(www.xilu.com )版权所有 点击拥有西陆免费论坛  联系西陆小精灵

0.18591690063477