财经社区女性社区汽车社区军事社区文学社区社会社区娱乐社区游戏社区个人空间
上一主题:时间就是物体在空间的位置的数学... 下一主题:波动理论无法解释的衍射实验
Time derivation formula
[楼主] 作者:混天下第一  发表时间:2012/08/28 09:41
点击:1245次

Time derivation formula

Keywords; time, formulas, theory of relativity, mechanics, movement, time of origin: China Wuxing wide吴兴广

的时候,觉得很有感触,而再看时,好像文中又没说什么。" f="Preface I see the beginning of feel very touching, when we look at, as if the text did not say what. " d="前言我初看<论证时间是所有运动物体的一个共量>的时候,觉得很有感触,而再看时,好像文中又没说什么。">Preface I see the beginning of <demonstration time is a total of the amount of all moving objects> feel very touching, when we look at, as if the text did not say what. Do you have such a question? How do you see the origin of the "time of the essence of time"? Text in classical mechanics, we think that time has nothing to do with the movement amount. We can say that time is an independent variable, so we chose a time as the basic amount, the basic unit of s where the time has nothing to do with sports, sports does not affect the size of the time. The time can be used to describe the size of the movement, describes motion. T = S / V. wherein T represents time, S represents the shift, V represents the velocity V = S / T (T is the independent variable) Release. In the formula T = S / V t is the independent variable, and the significance of the formula is that we can time was determined based on the displacement and velocity of the object. We are standing T is the independent variable angle look at the formula. In the theory of relativity, time is on the point of view of an argument, according to the time or relative and absolute speed, the time of a moving object, the slower the greater movement. So I think that classical mechanics or relativistic time is an independent variable for the starting point, we can watch time starting to recognize the time. So why time clocks can be said? Time come from? Time has been an argument?

Not.

Before no concept of time, the time to come. Speaking from the watch had to watch time ago what? Understanding of the reference system, watch from similar reference system. Timepiece standard to describe the size of the movement of the object to the size of their own movement. The reference system for a fixed point, we through the description of the reference system can be the length of a movement of the object (or the amount of movement), but the reference system does not describe the size of the motion of an object. So, we got a moving object to describe the motion of an object as a standard size. This is the watch originally comes from. The object is to watch.

In the description of the size of the movement of the object or comparing different movement of the object size,

We found that the movement of objects by a common amount, all motion of the object has this amount. [1] This quantity is the same, is the same. This amount is still a variable. This quantity is: as a standard object (size) own movement through space. Objects through space is the length of movement or said displacement. Expressed by the formula that is, the size of the length of the movement / motion = this common amount. Symbol now with a mathematical formula is T = S / V. This amount is common T has nothing to do with the size of the movement. 1) Sports (or faster), the object and the movement of small objects have this amount, and equal. 2) because regardless of the magnitude of the motion, it is an object movement when in combination with the motion hours, this quantity is also constant. Then the magnitude of the motion also has nothing to do with the amount of change occurs. 3) This variable is a dependent variable, after the change of the space changes due to moving objects. Specific see the origin of the "time of the essence of time." Later, we originally used to measure the movement of objects the size of an object to represent the common amount of time. S / V is the volume, which is the dependent variable, T = S / V is the amount of the formula. Where is the time from? Time from the sport, there is no movement, there is no time. T = S / V, the unit of time here is a derivation unit, by the S / V derived. Units with the force F is somewhat similar.

When this amount from all objects or watches said this amount, this amount becomes the amount has nothing to do with the size of the movement of objects described, unrelated to the amount of change or not to change the size of the movement. At this time, we believe that the time is an independent variable. In classical mechanics, time began. The time chosen fundamental quantity used to describe the other physical quantities. For example, according to V = S / T derived units of the size V of the movement.

I think that the theory of relativity starting directly from the time an argument (not considering no watches said previous stage to introduce the relationship between time and movement, not to consider the origin of the time), according to the absolute degree of speed. This conclusion is related to the absolute speed has nothing to do with the size of the absolute degree of speed. (That is, as long as the absolute speed, regardless of size can be drawn.)

Same formula T = S / V, our understanding of time is not the same, can cause a different meaning.

First, we describe the size of the movement and found that this amount, this amount is equivalent to S / V. We later time indicates that the amount of time indicated by T. Therefore T = S / V. In formula T = S / V represents the origin of the time, and time is a dependent variable. T is common for all objects. T is the time for all objects.

When we find that this is a total of the amount of time is the same as when we use the motion of an object the size of all the objects of the time. When we use a size of the motion of the object represents the time of all the objects, i.e. the watch represents the time when, for the objects being described, time is an independent variable. Describe the time we watch to describe the length of the movement, according to the reference system derived V = S / T. V = S / T launch T = S / V. T = S / V means that we can find the time according to the displacement and velocity of the object, the time has nothing to do with the movement amount. T is the time used by the object is described.

According to time is a common amount of all the moving objects and all objects is stationary, there is no time. Stationary objects usually we say time is relative to the movement of said objects. Moving object represented by a point in space is the moment, the stationary objects represented by a point in space is the moment.

The flow of time, i.e. the time from one time to another time, is achieved through the movement of the object. 2012-8-27 19:51:59

For movement, under certain conditions, can be seen as static. This certain conditions the Reference Department moment. Movement as nothing more than a form of the origin of the movement still. Or in the origin of the movement of the object is stationary, this should be the second definition of stationary. [2]

References: [1] "time of the essence of time, the origin of" [2] "argument time is a total of the amount of all moving objects"

 

 
The inevitably wrong translation, see Chinese original
本帖地址:http://club.xilu.com/hongbin/msgview-950451-275431.html[复制地址]
上一主题:时间就是物体在空间的位置的数学... 下一主题:波动理论无法解释的衍射实验

精彩推荐>>

  简捷回复 [点此进入编辑器回帖页]  文明上网 理性发言
 推荐到西陆名言:
签  名:
作  者:
密  码:
游客来访 
注册用户 提 交
西陆网(www.xilu.com )版权所有 点击拥有西陆免费论坛  联系西陆小精灵

0.1234450340271