财经社区女性社区汽车社区军事社区文学社区社会社区娱乐社区游戏社区个人空间
上一主题:批判沈建其教授目的是批判朱顶余... 下一主题:其实这是一块学术“试金石”!!...
评“《自然》评出的2012年五大挑战性科学实验”
[楼主] 作者:李子丰  发表时间:2012/02/10 15:58
点击:1116次

评“《自然》评出的2012年五大挑战性科学实验”

李子丰

(燕山大学石油工程研究所,河北秦皇岛 066004

摘要:逐条分析了《自然》评出的五项前沿实验:1寻找外星生命的蛛丝马迹,(2)看穿手性分子的镜像,(3)寻找额外的空间维度,(4)捕捉引力波,(5)对千克进行重新定义。得出了前两个实验是近期不可能实现的伟大理想,后三个是将物理学拉向泥潭的谬论。

关键词:自然杂志,外星生命,分子镜像,多维空间,引力波,千克

Comments on “Frontier experiments: Tough science- Five experiments as hard as finding the Higgs

Li Zifeng

(Petroleum Engineering Institute of Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004)

Abstract: The five frontier experiments published on Nature are commented item by item: spotting distant signs of life, seeing through the molecular mirror, looking for extra dimensions, catching a gravity wave, redefining the kilogram. It is concluded that the first two experiments are great ideals that are impossible to realize in recent years, the last three are false theories pulling physics into morass.

Key words: Nature, distant signs of life, molecular mirror, extra dimensions, gravity wave, kilogram


20121月《自然》刊登了Nicola Jones的文章“Frontier experiments: Tough science”[1],介绍了五项前沿实验:1寻找外星生命的蛛丝马迹,(2)看穿手性分子的镜像,(3)寻找额外的空间维度,(4)捕捉引力波,(5)对千克进行重新定义。国内媒体对次进行了全文报道[2]。下面就这五项实验进行分析。

一、寻找外星生命的蛛丝马迹

寻找外星生命是人们一直进行着的探索,从没有停止过。比大海捞针难上数万倍,是概率为零的小概率事件。在一二十年内不可能被证实。

二、看穿手性分子的镜像

文章说,要完成此项工作要求具备分辨率极高的光谱仪,迄今最好的光谱仪能够识别出5/1014的能级差别,而他们需要的光谱仪的清晰度将约为目前市面上最好的光谱仪的100万倍。要在近期内,将光谱仪的分别率提高100万倍是不可能的。

三、寻找额外的空间维度

物理空间本来就是三维的[3]。多维(大于3维)空间理论本来就是谬论。实验测量更是不可能。

四、捕捉引力波

引力是动量的等效表达[4]。不存在引力子。物体之间一直在相互作用,不存在引力波。更捕捉不到引力波。

五、对千克进行重新定义

文章[1]建议废除质量这个以物体来定义的国际单位,就像现在用光在真空中的行进速度来定义米(在真空中行进的光在299792458分之一秒内旅行的距离为一米)一样,用普朗克常数h、辐射电磁波的频率vE=mc2取代物体,重新对千克下定义。

用光在真空中的行进速度来定义米存在如下问题:(1)光在真空中的速度是一个绝对的常数,还是一个速度范围,还不确定[5];(2)即使光在真空中的速度是一个绝对的常数,绝大多数人也没法使用-没法刻划真空中行进的光在299792458分之一秒内旅行的距离。为此,用光在真空中的行进速度来定义的米没有多少实用价值。尽管放在法国巴黎国际度量衡局(BIMP)的会随着环境和时间有极其微小的变化,但它好用。

如果按照文章[1]的建议,改用本来就错误的E=mc2[6-9]定义千克,将导致内涵错误。

综上所述,前两个实验是近期不可能实现的伟大理想,后三个是将物理学拉向泥潭的谬论。

 

参考文献

[1] Nicola Jones. Frontier experiments: Tough science- Five experiments as hard as finding the Higgs [J]. Nature, 2012, 481: 14-17.

[2] 刘霞. 《自然》评出2012年五大挑战性科学实验[N]. 科技日报, 2012-2-5(2).

[3] 李子丰, 王兆运. 唯物主义时空质能观[J]. 科技信息, 2007,(18): 21-22.

[4] 李子丰. 用物体与微粒子的动量交换解释万有引力定律[J]. 中国西部科技, 2011, 10(28): 1-3.

[5] 李子丰. 光的粒子性与光速[J]. 中国西部科技, 2010, 9(13): 16-17.

[6] Li Zifeng. Special Relativity Arising from a Misunderstanding of Experimental Results on the Constant Speed of Light[J]. Physics Essays, 2008, 21 (2):96-102.

[7] 李子丰, 李天降, 王长进, . 狭义相对论的本质及对科学哲学和社会的影响[J]. 科技信息, 2007, (19): 1-3.

[8] 李子丰. 狭义相对论源于与对光速不变原理的错误解释[J]. 科技信息, 2007, (19): 81-86.

[9] 李子丰. 质量与能量的本来关系[J]. 科技信息, 2007, (20): 6-8.

本帖地址:http://club.xilu.com/hongbin/msgview-950451-263008.html[复制地址]
上一主题:批判沈建其教授目的是批判朱顶余... 下一主题:其实这是一块学术“试金石”!!...
[楼主]  [2楼]  作者:李子丰  发表时间: 2012/03/26 13:58 

Dear Lie Zifeng,

dear colleagues,

I agree with the comments of Li Zifeng: Comments on "Frontier experiments: Tough science-Five experiments as hard as finding the Higgs" on the paper of the same name by Nicola Jones in Nature, 2012, 481, pp. 14-17. Indeed, the experiments, suggested in the paper, are false targets. The whole of contemporary science, based on the Theory of Relativity, is false. Despite the fact that engineers have created instruments and apparatus which enable us to obtain new knowledge about the micro- and macrocosm, the interpretation of this knowledge by the academic scientists is false. These scientists enter mankind in error, for him put false targets, which example are and above mentioned experiments.

What is science? The science is that, what gives us knowledge about the world. The Theory of Relativity gives false ideas about the world. Instead of True it spreads Lie. Therefore, the Theory of Relativity is a pseudoscience. The Theory of Relativity must be discarded and forgotten!

More than 40 years back in my works I have proved, that the force of interaction of electrified or of magnetized bodies depends not only on distance but also on the velocity between the interacting bodies. The equation for this force, I also gave. Take it and solve all the problems of electromagnetic interactions. The Special Theory of Relativity is no longer needed!

In my works, I have shown that all observed motions in the Solar system are described by Newton's law of gravitation. I have created the precise method for solving equations of the gravitational interaction of bodies. It is implemented in the program Galactica, with which I have solved many problems. The whole system of Galactica is available at: http://www.ikz.ru/~smulski/GalactcW/. The information on it I am attaching by files Galct11R.pdf and Galct11E.pdf in Russian and English, respectively. Take it and solve all the urgent tasks that are currently facing humanity. Get with the help of Galactica new knowledge about the world. Do not mention more the Theory of Relativity, do not criticize it. It is useless!!!

Here is an example. More than 15 years ago in my works I showed that the Big Bang and the Expanding Universe are impossible, because all bodies attract each other. My evidence is so obvious that it cannot be rejected. So are my proofs became a sensation? Is all establishment science began to quote my work? Was I awarded Nobel Prize for these scientific results? No, none of my arguments are not mentioned. You, too, antyrelativists, did not mention these work, as well as no mention of my other works.

Now think about why, you antirelyativists, not mention about my work? Because to you it is not favorable. If the Big Bang theory will disappear, if the Theory of Relativity will disappear, it would not be object to criticism. And, besides, everyone antirelyativist wants to create a theory similar to the Theory of Relativity and instead of Einstein to stand on a pedestal.

However we shall return to an academic science. My work is not cited academics, but my arguments are taken into account. Now they say something like this. The whole mass of the Universe are matter (12 percent) and dark energy (rest). The dark energy objectively exists, though yet have no be discovered by a science. Without dark energy cannot be the Big Bang and the Expanding Universe. If there were no dark energy, the gravitational force is not possible to expand the universe. Thanks to dark energy there are forces of gravitation with opposite sign, which provide expansion of the universe.

I am repeating again, the contemporary science is false, and scientists, who profess it, are insane. This science should be discarded and forgotten. Here is a second example from the field of microcosm. Dr. Ricardo Carezani and David de Hilster in their works clearly outlined the situation with the neutrino. Radioactive radium convertes into polonium and emits electrons. In 1927 C. D. Ellis and W. A. Wooster in calorimetry had measured energy of the electrons: 0.36 MeV. In 1931 from the standpoint of the Theory of Relativity Wolfgang Pauli counts the kinetic energy of the electron and receives 1.16 MeV. This value is due to the dependence of the electron mass on the velocity, adopted in the Theory of Relativity. In fact, as I mentioned, the mass is constant, and the force depends on the velocity. However, the relativists believe that such an erroneous energy 1.16 MeV is real, so they think out a particle the neutrino, which must be the bearer of false energy 1.16 MeV - 0.36 MeV = 0.86 MeV. More than half a century of establishment science put grand experiments to search for neutrinos. Now there is a new sensation: the velocity of neutrinos exceeds speed of light. The sensation is "grandiose", because the excess is much smaller than the uncertainty in the speed of light. This experiment with neutrino and its outcome is absurd of nonsense. If there is a superluminal motion, there is no Theory of Relativity, and therefore there is no neutrino.

However, now in all nuclear transformations the neutrino is introduced. All the energy balances of nuclear reactions experimentally measured. The experimental values are increased by fictitious energy of neutrinos, and then they are reduced by this amount, due to the fact that all the neutrinos fly freely. As a result, the establishment scientists say for all mankind that without the Theory of Relativity, without neutrinos, without quarks, and without froggy quacks (in the next phase) the nuclear energy is not possible.

I repeat once again, the contemporary science is false, and scientists, who profess it, are insane. This science should be discarded and forgotten. Concentrate your efforts on obtaining new knowledge about the world through a system of Galactica. If your age does not allow to master work on the computer, involve young people, students, and can even be able pupils. The description of system Galactica will give them the necessary knowledge to work with the program Galactica. Your knowledge and your experience will help young people to master other scientific problems.


Sincerely yours Prof. Joseph J. Smulsky

A chief scientist of the Institute of Earth's Cryosphere

doctor of physical-mathematical sciences,

Professor of theoretical and applied mechanics.

Institute of Earth's Cryosphere, P.O.B 1230,

625000, Tyumen, Russia,

E-mail: jsmulsky@mail.ru

http://www.smul1.newmail.ru/

[楼主]  [3楼]  作者:李子丰  发表时间: 2012/03/26 13:58 

Dear Lie Zifeng,

dear colleagues,

I agree with the comments of Li Zifeng: Comments on "Frontier experiments: Tough science-Five experiments as hard as finding the Higgs" on the paper of the same name by Nicola Jones in Nature, 2012, 481, pp. 14-17. Indeed, the experiments, suggested in the paper, are false targets. The whole of contemporary science, based on the Theory of Relativity, is false. Despite the fact that engineers have created instruments and apparatus which enable us to obtain new knowledge about the micro- and macrocosm, the interpretation of this knowledge by the academic scientists is false. These scientists enter mankind in error, for him put false targets, which example are and above mentioned experiments.

What is science? The science is that, what gives us knowledge about the world. The Theory of Relativity gives false ideas about the world. Instead of True it spreads Lie. Therefore, the Theory of Relativity is a pseudoscience. The Theory of Relativity must be discarded and forgotten!

More than 40 years back in my works I have proved, that the force of interaction of electrified or of magnetized bodies depends not only on distance but also on the velocity between the interacting bodies. The equation for this force, I also gave. Take it and solve all the problems of electromagnetic interactions. The Special Theory of Relativity is no longer needed!

In my works, I have shown that all observed motions in the Solar system are described by Newton's law of gravitation. I have created the precise method for solving equations of the gravitational interaction of bodies. It is implemented in the program Galactica, with which I have solved many problems. The whole system of Galactica is available at: http://www.ikz.ru/~smulski/GalactcW/. The information on it I am attaching by files Galct11R.pdf and Galct11E.pdf in Russian and English, respectively. Take it and solve all the urgent tasks that are currently facing humanity. Get with the help of Galactica new knowledge about the world. Do not mention more the Theory of Relativity, do not criticize it. It is useless!!!

Here is an example. More than 15 years ago in my works I showed that the Big Bang and the Expanding Universe are impossible, because all bodies attract each other. My evidence is so obvious that it cannot be rejected. So are my proofs became a sensation? Is all establishment science began to quote my work? Was I awarded Nobel Prize for these scientific results? No, none of my arguments are not mentioned. You, too, antyrelativists, did not mention these work, as well as no mention of my other works.

Now think about why, you antirelyativists, not mention about my work? Because to you it is not favorable. If the Big Bang theory will disappear, if the Theory of Relativity will disappear, it would not be object to criticism. And, besides, everyone antirelyativist wants to create a theory similar to the Theory of Relativity and instead of Einstein to stand on a pedestal.

However we shall return to an academic science. My work is not cited academics, but my arguments are taken into account. Now they say something like this. The whole mass of the Universe are matter (12 percent) and dark energy (rest). The dark energy objectively exists, though yet have no be discovered by a science. Without dark energy cannot be the Big Bang and the Expanding Universe. If there were no dark energy, the gravitational force is not possible to expand the universe. Thanks to dark energy there are forces of gravitation with opposite sign, which provide expansion of the universe.

I am repeating again, the contemporary science is false, and scientists, who profess it, are insane. This science should be discarded and forgotten. Here is a second example from the field of microcosm. Dr. Ricardo Carezani and David de Hilster in their works clearly outlined the situation with the neutrino. Radioactive radium convertes into polonium and emits electrons. In 1927 C. D. Ellis and W. A. Wooster in calorimetry had measured energy of the electrons: 0.36 MeV. In 1931 from the standpoint of the Theory of Relativity Wolfgang Pauli counts the kinetic energy of the electron and receives 1.16 MeV. This value is due to the dependence of the electron mass on the velocity, adopted in the Theory of Relativity. In fact, as I mentioned, the mass is constant, and the force depends on the velocity. However, the relativists believe that such an erroneous energy 1.16 MeV is real, so they think out a particle the neutrino, which must be the bearer of false energy 1.16 MeV - 0.36 MeV = 0.86 MeV. More than half a century of establishment science put grand experiments to search for neutrinos. Now there is a new sensation: the velocity of neutrinos exceeds speed of light. The sensation is "grandiose", because the excess is much smaller than the uncertainty in the speed of light. This experiment with neutrino and its outcome is absurd of nonsense. If there is a superluminal motion, there is no Theory of Relativity, and therefore there is no neutrino.

However, now in all nuclear transformations the neutrino is introduced. All the energy balances of nuclear reactions experimentally measured. The experimental values are increased by fictitious energy of neutrinos, and then they are reduced by this amount, due to the fact that all the neutrinos fly freely. As a result, the establishment scientists say for all mankind that without the Theory of Relativity, without neutrinos, without quarks, and without froggy quacks (in the next phase) the nuclear energy is not possible.

I repeat once again, the contemporary science is false, and scientists, who profess it, are insane. This science should be discarded and forgotten. Concentrate your efforts on obtaining new knowledge about the world through a system of Galactica. If your age does not allow to master work on the computer, involve young people, students, and can even be able pupils. The description of system Galactica will give them the necessary knowledge to work with the program Galactica. Your knowledge and your experience will help young people to master other scientific problems.


Sincerely yours Prof. Joseph J. Smulsky

A chief scientist of the Institute of Earth's Cryosphere

doctor of physical-mathematical sciences,

Professor of theoretical and applied mechanics.

Institute of Earth's Cryosphere, P.O.B 1230,

625000, Tyumen, Russia,

E-mail: jsmulsky@mail.ru

http://www.smul1.newmail.ru/

 [4楼]  作者:否定相对论  发表时间: 2012/03/26 21:38 

引力波是根本不不存在的。万有引力的形成原理我已经破解(暂不公开)
 [5楼]  作者:silin007  发表时间: 2012/03/27 06:09 

置疑十大物理实验 求证十大科学发现

作者 思林

【摘 要】 美国物理学家评出的“最美丽”十大物理实验,的确都很美丽但却不是无可置疑的,而无可置疑的是这一系列重大的发现轨迹表明,物理学由简单到复杂、由精确到模糊、由确定到不确定的发展历程,至于本文求证的一系列“最朴实”的十大发现,将导致物理学在无需任何假设的前提下现实完全彻底的大统一。

【关键词】 任意时刻 理想质点 万有引力 引力系数 引力摄动


2002年美国物理学家评出的十大经典物理实验,之所以被誉为是“最美丽”的实验,主要因为这些实验的共同之处是:用最简单的实验方法、或最基本的数学方法、以及最单纯的物理结论建造了一座又座科学发展史上的里程碑。然而这些里程碑由于历史的局限性,不仅有的实验结论虽然很单纯但因前提不正确而不可能得出科学的结论,更重要的是所有的实验都因存在着这样或那样让人疑惑未解的问题而并不是无可置疑的。

例一、在埃拉托色尼测量地球圆周长实验中,时间到底是什么?

例二、在伽利略的自由落体实验中,究竞什么是自然物的本质?
例三、在伽利略的加速度实验中,重力加速度为什么恒定存在?
例四、在牛顿的棱镜分解太阳光实验中,七色光是分解出来的?

例五、在卡文迪许扭矩实验中,测出了引力恒量的参数普适吗?
例六、在托马斯?杨的光干涉实验中,光的传播需不需要媒质?
例七、在米歇尔?傅科钟摆实验中,钟摆旋转是因房屋在移动?

例八、在罗伯特?米利肯的油滴实验中,电荷是电子的带电量?
例九、在卢瑟福发现核子实验中,原子核为何静止在原子中心?
例十、在双缝演示应用于电子干涉实验中,波粒二象真成立吗?

而当我们先抛开对这些实验的(或许是毫无意义的)置疑,重新审视根据每年夏日正午两地物体的太阳影子不同,来计算地球的周长物理实验时,就应该发现在物理学上始终忽视着“时刻”这一个非常重要的物理概念,因为所有的物理实验几乎都是以一个初始时刻到一个终止时刻的“时间间隔”为前提条件,而此实验则只是以一个(应该是等于零的)时刻为前提条件,所以从这一前提条件出发,不仅能根据太阳照在地球上的物体的影子,来计算地球的周长;更能够根据在“任意时刻”电磁光热声等波动现象均无法产生或尚未形成的事实,来证明将导致物理学统一的“最朴实(也就是根本无需假设)的”十大科学发现。

第一、卡文迪许扭矩实验测出的万有引力恒量的参数并不是宇宙中的普适常数;

第二、构成宇宙万物的所有化学元素都是仅由相互作用的质子构成的无核星系;
第三、在化学元素中的电磁强弱等相互作用都是与距离平方成反比的万有引力;
第四、电磁光热声等波动现象的本质是高速转动着的质子之间的万有引力摄动;

第五、宇宙仅仅是由因相互之间的引力作用而在虚空中运动的无数质子构成的;
第六、牛顿力学的完备性的三大定律的实质是物体本质与物质关系及物理系统;
第七、自然界的一切现象都是由实物之间的引力关系构成的物质与能量及信息;

第八、电磁论是在与燃素和热质等同出一辄的电磁荷基础之上建立的错误假说;
第九、相对论是在违反速率合成法则的前提下用错误的变换推导出的荒谬理论;
第十、量子论是在混淆了波动与粒子之间区别才编造波粒二象性的测不准原理。

至于本文提出的置疑与发现虽然因与当代物理观念格格不入而让人难以理解,但只要我们再重新审视一下“扭矩实验”就可以发现:人们在做此实验时始终忽略了“地心引力”这一非常关键的实验条件,如果这一条件改变了的话,那么万有引力恒量的参数也应随之而改变。要证明这一预言并不难,除了到极地与月球及太空等处去验证,再就是从万有引力与向心力在行星结构上的恒等关系(GMm/R2=mu2/R)中来求证,因为万有引力恒量毫无疑问的是物体之间的引力关系常数,所以在不同的引力关系中就应该有不同的引力系数。

这就是笔者请求有实验条件与计算能力的读者,依据在月球上与化学元素中及失重的条件下,物体之间的引力关系肯定不同的事实,亲自验证一下这一即简单、又精确、还确定无疑的第一个发现。并由此出发则不仅笔者的其他九个发现,以及他人的种种发现都将随之而被彻底的证实或证伪;而且本文对十大物理实验的置疑,以及人们对物理学上的所有置疑无论正确与否,都将随之而得到圆满的答复;最重要的是物理学的统一,以及人类知识的统一必将随之而在牛顿的科学研究领纲的指导下成为现实。

※※※※※※
即别轻信人说的,也别坚信己学的,更别迷信书写的;只信亲眼能见的,而且亲手能算的,关键亲身能验的;科学事实
 [6楼]  作者:宇观系统论  发表时间: 2012/03/27 10:32 

对【4楼】说:

对于每一论题都有人想争功,包括李子丰,但这些都不过是极度无知的表现。

大凡做研究,必须首先弄清楚前人在自己研究论题领域的成果,再提出自己不同于前人研究成果的新论点,如果是别人早已经提出的,你不但不引用,反而说是自己的研究成果,这是人品方面的严重问题,在学术研究中是应该尽量避免的。



※※※※※※
黄氏时空由光频多普勒红移定义可变时间单位秒t'=tsquart[(C-V)/(C+V)].时间秒的变化导致了可变光速C'=Csquart[(C-V)/(C+V)].光速的变化导致了可变距离单位米l'=lsquart[(C-V)/(C+V)].黄氏自旋衰变相互作用模型:引力=动量时间变化率,电磁力=角动量时空变化率.超光速C=2ZM/r

精彩推荐>>

  简捷回复 [点此进入编辑器回帖页]  文明上网 理性发言
 推荐到西陆名言:
签  名:
作  者:
密  码:
游客来访 
注册用户 提 交
西陆网(www.xilu.com )版权所有 点击拥有西陆免费论坛  联系西陆小精灵

0.19485688209534