|
引自http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/crackpot.html by John Baez>
9. 10 points for each claim that quantum mechanics is fundamentally misguided (without good evidence). 10. 10 points for beginning the description of your theory by saying how long you have been working on it. (10 more for emphasizing that you worked on your own.) 13. 10 points for offering prize money to anyone who proves and/or finds any flaws in your theory. 15. 10 points for each statement along the lines of "I'm not good at math, but my theory is conceptually right, so all I need is for someone to express it in terms of equations". 16. 10 points for arguing that a current well-established theory is "only a theory", as if this were somehow a point against it. 18. 10 points for each favorable comparison of yourself to Einstein, or claim that special or general relativity are fundamentally misguided (without good evidence). 21. 20 points for suggesting that you deserve a Nobel prize. 22. 20 points for each favorable comparison of yourself to Newton or claim that classical mechanics is fundamentally misguided (without good evidence). 25. 20 points for naming something after yourself. (E.g., talking about the "The Evans Field Equation" when your name happens to be Evans.) 33. 40 points for comparing those who argue against your ideas to Nazis, stormtroopers, or brownshirts. 34. 40 points for claiming that the "scientific establishment" is engaged in a "conspiracy" to prevent your work from gaining its well-deserved fame, or suchlike. 35. 40 points for comparing yourself to Galileo, suggesting that a modern-day Inquisition is hard at work on your case, and so on. 36. 40 points for claiming that when your theory is finally appreciated, present-day science will be seen for the sham it truly is. (30 more points for fantasizing about show trials in which scientists who mocked your theories will be forced to recant.) 37. 50 points for claiming you have a revolutionary theory but giving no concrete testable predictions.
|
