财经社区女性社区汽车社区军事社区文学社区社会社区娱乐社区游戏社区个人空间
上一主题:《狭义相对论“速度变换”的谬误... 下一主题:地球被撞爆裂说
我的《相对论在电动力学中一处重大篡改行为的公告》被删了
[楼主] 作者:陆道渊  发表时间:2009/02/09 13:28
点击:570次

哈,我早就预料到有这一删;从篡改者孟庆信,维相者沈建其(还有几个隐名者)被公告笼住后的精神失常状态来看,只有一删,以图逃脱。为防自己人身不测,我还已迁居了呢。

尽管早有预料,现在还是感到可惜,维相者在贴中妄图用他门的各种拙劣的‘智’(只差聊斋中的七孔流血和披头散发了)来否定所举证的铁证材料和齐绩先生作为第三者的认证,结果演出了一幕幕波澜迭起的真实版喜剧,令人喷饭。由于举证材料的内容仅涉及初等数学勾股定理,可以说雅俗共赏,人人可以欣赏,闲来把读胜过《今古奇观》《三言两拍》《夜雨秋灯》《世说新语》等等,等等,具有极大宣传力。

不过欲盖弥彰,反相潮流浩浩湯湯,好戏在后头呢!

本帖地址:http://club.xilu.com/hongbin/msgview-950451-181803.html[复制地址]
上一主题:《狭义相对论“速度变换”的谬误... 下一主题:地球被撞爆裂说
 [2楼]  作者:王飞cn  发表时间: 2009/02/09 13:40 

不好意思,是我连累了你,我在你的贴中有与沈博士的讨论,看来有人不知如何挺沈,只好封杀了!

※※※※※※
空间本无物理性质,物质场下的空间才有了局部静止系、惯性,运动才可以自身测量。
 [3楼]  作者:xhzjzs  发表时间: 2009/02/09 20:14 

究竟谁删不得而知。不过,沈博士没有删我的贴。我相信他不会做这种龌龊的事情的。
虽然我口头上藐视他,不过心里是尊重他的。我们也应该让对手尊重,唯有实力。
楼主,几个版主,有两个是浙江的。都是老乡,删贴真是太不给面子了。
难道版主认为你们的帖子讨论太少了,谩骂太多了?(应该不是)。不利于反相事业。
其实,沈建其也是反相者。他不是有两个挑战相对论的论坛吗。楼主不要把沈版主当成维护者,他会很生气的。
我们不能把维相者当敌人,都是中国人,何必呢。
我倒是挺希望见到维相者沈建其和fuj0(大概也反相,他们立场搞不清楚)的。
一是跟高手切磋能提高自己,二是跟他们辩论挺有趣的。不过fuj0老不出现,挺可惜的。

※※※※※※
理论是人为的 实验是客观的 相对论穷途末路 光介质势如破竹
[楼主]  [4楼]  作者:陆道渊  发表时间: 2009/02/09 21:56 

我检查后面几页,到第四次检查,发现又出现了。现在第7页。
 [5楼]  作者:hudemi  发表时间: 2009/02/09 23:26 

本人也碰到过这种现象(尤其是比较早的贴),开始找不到,找几次又找到了,有点怪!可能与西陆的管理有关.
 [6楼]  作者:张崇安  发表时间: 2009/02/10 07:20 

一是跟高手切磋能提高自己,二是跟他们辩论挺有趣的。不过fuj0老不出现,挺可惜的。
===================================
我也感到fuj0先生不出现是个遗憾!这位先生的物理功底不错,而且能够宽容别人!
[楼主]  [7楼]  作者:陆道渊  发表时间: 2009/02/11 10:32 

首先谢谢王飞先生。三楼的话就懵动了;jq先生是相对论的活载体,对相对论的斗争是革命,伤及他有什么办法。你这样就像街坊里大妈,根本不能反相,还是打毛线去罢。
 [8楼]  作者:xhzjzs  发表时间: 2009/02/12 20:52 

7楼:
你真能冷嘲热讽呢。反相主要靠建立新的完善理论。光推翻它已没有意思,纯属浪费时间。
我最讨厌犹太人了,几乎都是骗子。至于建其,跟他玩玩而已。

在切磋中提高:1.了解新知识。2.提高反诡辩能力、判断是非的能力。3.复习一下数学。

※※※※※※
理论是人为的 实验是客观的 相对论穷途末路 光介质势如破竹

[楼主]  [9楼]  作者:陆道渊  发表时间: 2009/02/13 00:08 
[楼主]  [10楼]  作者:陆道渊  发表时间: 2009/02/13 08:39 

说你懵懂是碍于情面,其实你已到了冬烘的程度。这jq维相已到了裸奔,你却说他是反相的。那东郭先生是因狼求救,而你却主动护维相者了。

当然,当我所举证的鉄证遭jq颠到黑白地蛮缠时,得到了你认证。真的要谢谢你。

 [11楼]  作者:jqsphy  发表时间: 2009/02/13 12:31 

陆道渊先生是不受我尊重的讨论者之一。他的鸵鸟政策令我讨厌。
但我从来不删帖子。他的帖子中有很多没有回答我的问题,还一直摆在那里,等着他来回复呢。我怎么会去删?他倒好,用“举证”就是“只举不证”的含义来应对。那么“选举”难道就是“只选不举”了?老辈人有句老话叫做“选举,选举,上面选选,下面举举”呢。你比老辈人还不厚道。

陆道渊有精力心痛自己的帖子不见了,为什么没有精力去耐心回复别人的跟帖呢。你“只举不证”的意义有什么用呢???

to xhzjzs, 我没有什么两个“挑战相对论的论坛”。只有这么Hongbin一个。2000年的某一天我忽然发现自己被列为版主之一,这也都是因为本人的帖子以讨论物理为主(而非骂人)。且虽然被列为版主之一有近10年,但我几乎不施行版主权力,实际上只承担义务,就是本人的帖子以讨论物理为主。

如果我施行版主权力的话,很多骂人的帖子,还有缺少物理东西的帖子(象李子丰,拉方,silin)等只有哲学口号的东西,都可以删。但我听之任之。
 [12楼]  作者:jqsphy  发表时间: 2009/02/13 12:44 


刚才帖子,因为系统问题,没有发成功,现在把主要意思再说一下:

陆先生,你的鸵鸟政策做法不受人尊重。被人删,咎由自取。但本人从不删帖。
你以为“举证”等于“只举不证”,这不厚道。农村人说“选 举”还要“选 举,选 举,上面选选,下面举举”呢。你不如他们厚道。

你的帖子跟帖中有那么多我让你来回复的问题,我等着你回复呢。现在被删了,你有精力心痛,为何无精力来具体“证”一下呢???
总之,咎由自取。你的“只举不证”,本来就令人讨厌。这是我的想法,恐怕也是删帖者的理由。
[楼主]  [13楼]  作者:陆道渊  发表时间: 2009/02/14 10:13 

12楼,你在我心目中已没有位置,我不会再回应你。你是我不费力的败者,你当然讨厌我;旗开得胜,你讨厌我,是反相事业首次实战胜利之大喜事的标志!·······························································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································································
 [14楼]  作者:jqsphy  发表时间: 2009/02/22 17:09 

好一派"只举不证"的产物!!
你如果把用来发牢骚的时间用在"证"上就好多了.
举是次要的,证,才是核心.
 [15楼]  作者:jqsphy  发表时间: 2009/02/22 17:12 

举,是次要的,证,才是核心.尤其是学术问题.

你有没有证错,有没有举错,包括你说的你"是不是傻子",这些统统不重要. 关键要有证的义务.

精彩推荐>>

  简捷回复 [点此进入编辑器回帖页]  文明上网 理性发言
 推荐到西陆名言:
签  名:
作  者:
密  码:
游客来访 
注册用户 提 交
西陆网(www.xilu.com )版权所有 点击拥有西陆免费论坛  联系西陆小精灵

0.21112298965454