1。给黑洞理论判死刑：关于黑洞，从理论上我能证实天体和宇宙的特殊时空区不存在，从实验观测上证实天体横向超光速的普遍存在（包括太阳表面上也能观测到10＾3m/s的超光速)。

2。给暗物质判死刑：关于暗物质，我能从理论和观测上否定它的存在。太阳绕银河中心运动的向心加速度比牛顿引力提供的大60km/s.这多出来的60km/s是由非量子化库仑力提供的，用我的系统场论已经能准确地计算出来。

【【【【呵呵呵，这位先生搞错了暗物质的存在范畴了吧？？暗物质表现为宇宙学效应，在银河系中它的引力并不表现出来，因为在银河系中普通物质的密度比暗物质密度高六个数量级。】】】】

3。给现在所有的环星系理论判死刑：范围从数百万光年到数千万光年的环星系是稳定的非牛顿引力星系。它们完全由万有磁力和非量子化库仑力维持。关于万有磁力，我在西安会议论文中有简单介绍，关于非量子化库仑力，我本来在一篇补寄西安会的论文《自旋和衰变是物质相互作用的基础》中有介绍，但他们说没有收到，可能是杨先生邮箱满了被过滤掉了，后寄往美国的一家不是权威的理论物理杂志发表了。

我明白在这里说这些没有什么意义，我的目的是给我们这些被称为“民科”的人一点鼓励。还可以说的一点是：物理学已经能重新回到一般人都能理解的经典物理学之中，超弦理论已经是死路一条，与霍金之流的Theory Of Everything的意愿会刚好相反，它将是一个什么也不是的理论（Theory Of Nothing！)。在世界最大的物理论坛（physicsforums.com)的关于超弦理论的20年打赌中，我赌20之内统一场论实现并有人会因此而获诺贝尔奖，但绝不可能是超弦理论！
我相信，只要认清大方向作不懈的努力，民科也有成功的可能。但要作出比象牙塔里的科学家多1000倍的努力，所以，成功与否要看我们的内力和勔力。

1。别忘了，暗物质的引入首先是从对银河系的实际观测结果开始的，也就是我在贴中说的太阳绕银河运动向心加速度与牛顿引力矛盾的结果。在宇宙学效应上，暗物质是从广义相对论场方程引入的，通俗的说就是宇宙平均密度与临界密度的差异（计算的结果是可视物质仅占6%）。你所指的应该是暗物质在整个宇宙中的平均密度比银河系的平均密度低，但理论计算银河系暗物质的密度是多少你不了解吗？你是不自觉的认为暗物质密度在宇宙的任何空间点上都是相同的吧？

.2。如果证实暗物质和黑洞都不存在，那么广义相对论还能活下去吗？

我没有听说过银河系测量导致了需要引入暗物质的这一东西，也没有听说银河系中向心加速度与牛顿引力矛盾。

请给出文献。

银河系中向心加速度与牛顿引力矛盾，那是因为银河系物质分布不均导致的问题，是涉及银河系结构问题。

关于银河暗物质的探测：

http://casswww.ucsd.edu/kim.html>

关于银河系质量和暗物质的简要资料：

http://astro.estec.esa.nl/SA-general/Projects/GAIA_files/LATEX2HTML/node45.html>

银河系没有发现暗物质的资料：

No Dark Matter Found in the Milky Way Galaxy

by Michael Oard and Jonathan Sarfati>

First published in:
Creation Ex Nihilo Technical Journal> 13(1):3–4, 1999

Probably the major cosmological debate among ‘big bang’ cosmologists is whether the universe will expand forever (‘open’) or will eventually collapse (‘closed’). This depends on the mass density of the universe, represented by the symbol Ω. If Ω < 1, then the universe is open; if Ω > 1, the universe is closed. The fate of the universe is directly related to whether the universe’s geometry is hyperbolic (open) or elliptical (closed), i.e. the multi-dimensional equivalent of a hyperboloid (‘saddle’) or ellipsoid or sphere. The currently fashionable ‘inflationary’ models predict that the universe’s density is just below the threshold of collapse, i.e. Ω = 1 — a geometrically ‘flat’ universe.1>

Biblical creationists should oppose the ‘big bang’ theory, because this implies a universe 10 to 15 Ga old, which contradicts biblical chronology and implies death before the Fall. However, some atheists, especially Marxists, also oppose the ‘big bang’! This is because it teaches that the universe has a beginning, and they dislike the corollary that everything that has a beginning has a cause.2>^,3> Other atheists try to salvage both the ‘big bang’ and their atheistic faith by postulating an eternally oscillating universe. One problem is that ‘several measurements currently seem to suggest a density of only a fraction Ω ≌ 0.3 of the critical density,’¹> and there are many insuperable difficulties even if we grant Ω > 1.²>^,3>

Many astronomers, because of their presuppositions, believe that 90 % of the mass of the universe is invisible matter, called dark matter. The dark matter is believed to exist in several forms: hot dark matter, 20 % of the total, and cold dark matter, 70 % of total.4> The dark matter could include neutrinos,5> burnt-out stars, smaller chunks of ordinary matter, or clouds of mysterious, exotic particles.6> Some astronomers had high hopes that ‘brown dwarfs’ (‘failed stars’ — bodies with insufficient mass to start thermonuclear fusion) could provide the ‘missing mass’. But a recent paper in Nature says ‘brown dwarfs do not contribute significantly to our Galaxy’s dark matter.’7>

‘Astronomers have long surmised that dark matter provides some of the gravitational glue required to hold galaxies together: Most galaxies rotate so fast that they would fly apart if their visible stars provide the only sources of gravity’.8>^,9>

One recent experimental report by Crézé et al. in Astronomy and Astrophysics has concluded that there is no dark matter in the disk of the Milky Way Galaxy.10> This report analyzed the proper motion of stars perpendicular to the galactic disk in a sphere of radius 125 parsecs around the sun. By analysing the distribution of motion for 100 stars, the team was able to analyse the gravitational pull dragging them back towards the galactic disk. In this way, the researchers could deduce the gravitational mass that is ‘practically hypothesis-free and model-free.’11> The experiment has been described as calculating the mass of the Earth from looking at samples of high jumpers and measuring the height they reach.⁸> They conclude, based essentially on observations, that the local dynamical density is ‘…well below all previous determinations leaving no room for any disk shaped component of dark matter.’¹¹> This report also gives the strong impression that many previous ‘results’ are biased by a model or hypothesis, making one wonder what can really be believed.

One implication of this research is that the Milky Way Galaxy is much younger than astronomers believe, and if our galaxy is representative of other galaxies, it also implies a much younger universe. Did the researchers abandon the dark matter hypothesis for our Milky Way Galaxy and deduce a much younger universe? No, sticking to previous models and assumptions, the researchers argue that the dark matter must be lurking in the halo of the Milky Way! The galactic halo is a large, spherical area encircling the galaxy and containing dust, gas, and globular clusters of stars. However, other researchers contend that previous observations of dark chunks of matter in the halo, considered a major breakthrough in 1996 in the search for dark matter, are probably dim stars in the Magellanic Clouds.12> Thus:

1. Science 280:1397–98. Return to text>.
2. Apologetics: an Introduction, Moody Press, Chicago, Ch. 3. Craig wrote: ‘When I was at the 16^th World Congress on Philosophy in Düsseldorf in 1978, I found that the only scientists who opposed the big-bang theory were Marxists from communist nations,’ p. 91. >Return to text>.
3. , 1998. If God created the universe, then who created God? >CEN Tech. J. 12(1):20–22. Return to text>.
4. Science 280:1398–1400. Return to text>.
5. Science 280:1405–1411. Return to text>.
6. Science 281:332–333. Return to text>.
7. Nature 397(6714):37–40. Return to text>.
8. Science 278:1230. Return to text>.
9. and others have pointed out that the Milky Way’s observed rotation rate, regardless of its cause, is so fast that: ‘if our galaxy were more than a few hundred million years old, it would be a featureless smear of stars instead of its present spiral shape.’Humphreys, D.R.>, 1991. Evidence for a young world>. Creation Ex Nihilo 13(3):28–31. Emphasis in original. Return to text>.
10. Astronomy and Astrophysics 329:920–936. Return to text>.
11. .
12. .